Technical
Due Diligence.
Move from scattered data rooms to structured, traceable findings. Review documentation, surface missing information and turn open questions into a clear next step.
WATCH THE WORKFLOWTurn complex asset documents into evidence you can act on. AI-assisted diligence and operational intelligence for energy and industry, with your experts in control.
Documents mapped. Gaps explained.
Findings linked to their sources, with your team in control.
Name the project, set the review objective and choose the data-room folder.
Behind every investment decision and every operational issue is a trail of documents, data, engineering knowledge and human judgment.
7OVA brings that context together, so teams can find what matters, understand why, and move forward with confidence.
Not another dashboard to manage. Purpose-built intelligence that fits the work your teams are already doing.
Move from scattered data rooms to structured, traceable findings. Review documentation, surface missing information and turn open questions into a clear next step.
WATCH THE WORKFLOWConnect turbine data, maintenance history and engineering know-how. Help teams investigate anomalies, prepare follow-ups and keep operational knowledge moving.
EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITIESInvestigate operational events with supporting history.
Related work orders, historical cases and technical procedures in one place.
Technical due diligence for wind, solar PV and battery storage is still document-heavy. We help teams move from manual review to structured, source-linked intelligence — while keeping experts in control.
Fragmented. Manual. Repetitive.
Structured. Evidence-led. Human-reviewed.
Move from data room intake toward a structured due diligence review.
Organize incoming documentation and surface missing items faster.
Flag gaps, inconsistencies and potential red flags with traceable sources.
Give technical experts context to validate findings rather than read everything from scratch.
Turn reviewed evidence into clear findings and an easier path to the DD report.
↗ Less manual review. More engineering judgment.
TALK THROUGH YOUR WORKFLOWIllustrative DD figures, not industry-wide averages or a quantified 7OVA speed claim. Timelines, team sizes, and document volumes vary by project.
The intelligence is only useful when it makes the next decision easier.
Documents, operational systems, maintenance records and relevant engineering knowledge.
Structure information, link it back to sources and surface inconsistencies or missing context.
Prepare findings, investigations and follow-ups your team can actually use.
Experts review what matters. Decisions remain accountable and grounded in evidence.
We don't believe the future of industry is another black box. We believe it's better access to context, clearer evidence and smarter ways for people to work.
Data rooms contain confidential commercial, legal and technical information. Security is not an add-on to our due diligence workflows — it shapes how we design them.
A formal security assurance program is part of our roadmap.
Working toward a structured information security management approach.
Client documents are not used to train AI foundation models.
EU-region hosting and data location requirements are addressed during project scoping.
Define purpose, access, retention and deletion safeguards for each engagement.
Granular permissions and traceable review activity are core design goals.
Security requirements and contractual safeguards are reviewed before sensitive project data is shared.
Transparency matters: SOC 2 and ISO 27001 are roadmap goals, not current certifications. Hosting, access control and audit capabilities depend on the agreed implementation scope.
Our backgrounds connect two worlds: the complexity of industrial operations and the possibilities of applied AI. We build where those worlds meet.
With an engineering background and a focus on renewable energy, he connects industrial challenges with practical AI solutions. Leads product direction, industry partnerships and customer workflows.
An AI engineer focused on machine learning, computer vision and applied AI systems. Leads the technical architecture and development of reliable, real-world industrial intelligence.
Confidential data. Defensible findings.
Clear limits on what the evidence can prove.
We agree the hosting region, authorized users, access rules and model providers before receiving confidential project data. A local processing path is available in development; hosted deployment, permissions, retention and deletion must be verified for the agreed implementation. The public workspace uses fictional records.
Our policy is not to use client documents to train foundation models. Model access, provider terms, retention and any permitted data processing must be agreed for your deployment. We do not treat a model provider’s marketing promise as a substitute for contractual and technical checks.
Keep the source observation, calculation, interpretation and recommended action separate. The workspace links findings and answers to document IDs, pages and original source material. Reviewers can inspect, question and record decisions. A citation helps verification; it does not make an answer correct by itself.
The sample review uses English, German and Italian sources and explicitly flags missing pages, signatures and evidence. In the current local backend, text-readable PDFs, TXT and CSV are supported. Scans require a readable copy or manual inspection; OCR and broader Office extraction still need implementation and validation. We assess your actual file mix before agreeing scope.
It measures evidence coverage against the project’s selected requirements. Each criterion has visible subchecks, supporting sources, a weight and a contribution to the total. Missing or unsuitable evidence remains open. It is not a probability of investment success, a valuation or a substitute for specialist sign-off.
Those specialists remain accountable for their conclusions. 7OVA supports document organization, source inspection, calculations, issue tracking and follow-up. A performance discrepancy can justify further investigation without proving a failed component; a contract gap can require counsel review without establishing legal invalidity.
We start by agreeing the source systems, directory structure, review mandate and required outputs. The demonstration supports source packs, coverage records, Excel workbooks and Word summaries. Native VDR connectors, shared access, SSO and other enterprise integrations must be scoped and validated; the website is not proof that those integrations are already deployed.
We can demonstrate the prepared review workflow, original source inspection, transparent completeness calculations, assessment workpapers, reviewer controls and exports. The local backend separately supports extraction and classification on readable documents. A pilot should test representative authorized files, source accuracy, failure handling, throughput and security requirements. The large document count in this public walkthrough is illustrative, not a measured processing benchmark.
Show us the review your team is preparing. We’ll walk through the evidence, the open questions and where 7OVA could help.
business@7ova.com